topics that matter; ideas worth sharing

share a tip, submit a link, add something new

Community-run sites idealistic, maybe not ideal

January 24, 2007, 01:04 PM —  IDG News Service — 

The debate surrounding the revelation that Microsoft Corp. offered to pay a developer to make changes to Wikipedia pages points to problems that can arise when a major Web site is managed by a community of people.

On Monday, Australian software engineer and author Rick Jelliffe wrote in a blog posting that Microsoft had offered to pay him as an independent source to make changes to certain Wikipedia entries. The offer, which Jelliffe doesn't appear to have accepted yet, set off a heated discussion about the ethics of such a move.

Responses from Wikipedia volunteers, which include conflicting opinions and indicate possible miscommunication, show the types of challenges a community-run online organization can face.

Microsoft said that before approaching Jelliffe, it tried to contact Wikipedia with concerns about some entries. "But Microsoft couldn't get a reply--hence why they decided it was important to enlist someone's help to actually address the inaccuracies in the posting so it would be fixed," said Catherine Brooker, a Microsoft spokesperson from the company's external public relations firm, Waggener Edstrom, in an e-mail.

Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia that anyone can edit. The site is maintained almost exclusively by volunteers. Around 1,000 administrators work on the English language site. Together, they set the policies that govern the site.

With so many people in charge, there are bound to be some differences of opinion and difficulties in communications.

David Gerard, a volunteer spokesman for Wikipedia, didn't seem to be aware that Microsoft had tried to contact Wikipedia about the postings. While the potential arrangement between Microsoft and Jelliffe struck Gerard as disappointing, another Wikipedia worker didn't seem bothered by it. Mathias Schindler, a board member of Wikimedia Germany sent e-mail to Jelliffe praising his efforts to fix the relevant postings. In the e-mail, which Microsoft shared, Schindler said he hoped to discuss with Microsoft Wikipedia articles related to the software giant.

Schindler didn't directly comment on the issue of Microsoft paying Jelliffe for the work.

For his part, Jelliffe hasn't said much since his initial blog posting. He didn't seem to mind the tone of the comments left after the posting, some of which were quite critical of Microsoft's offer. "Yes, they are harsh, but open source and open standards are ideas that capture the minds and hearts of people. They are the new socialism, and the devotees are passionate," he wrote in an e-mail. The Wikipedia entries in question include articles on OpenDocument Format, an electronic document format backed by open-source proponents, and Microsoft Office Open XML (OOXML), a sometimes competitive format.

Ultimately, the discussion around Microsoft's relationship with Jelliffe should draw more people to contribute to the relevant Wikipedia pages, resulting in a likely more informative article, Gerard said. Microsoft's spokeswoman Brooker echoed a similar sentiment. As of 2 p.m. GMT, 21 changes to the OpenDocument Wikipedia entry had been made on Wednesday.

IDG News Service

I like it!
Post a comment
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Resources
White Paper

Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.

Webcast

Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.

White Paper

Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.

Free stuff
Featured Sponsor

Get a broad understanding of important regulations and how you can make sure your site is in adherence.





Learn how VeriSign SGC-enabled SSL Certificates can help improve site security and customer confidence in the free white paper, "How to Offer the Strongest SSL Encryption." In this paper you will learn the differences between weak and strong encryption and what they mean for your site's performance.

Get VeriSign's free white paper: "The Latest Advancements in SSL Technology" and learn about the benefits of strong SSL encryption, Extended Validation (EV) SSL and security trust marks and what these SSL offerings can do for your site.

Now with Extended Validation (EV) SSL available from VeriSign, you can show your customers that they can trust your site. Learn about EV SSL benefits in this free VeriSign white paper.

More Resources