XP deadline matters little to business customers
The countdown is nearly over: Monday marks the long-awaited date after which PCs preloaded with Windows XP will no longer be available.
But now that the date is imminent, does anybody care? The segment of Windows users that cares about XP's end of life -- business customers -- isn't affected by this date and can still get its hands on XP for the foreseeable future.
June 30 is the Microsoft-imposed deadline after which PC makers won't be able to sell computers prepackaged with XP and after which Microsoft will no longer sell shrink-wrapped copies of the OS. The exception is low-cost notebooks, which can continue to ship with XP through June 30, 2010.
Microsoft has been talking about phasing out XP essentially since it launched Vista, and the process has been similar to previous Windows client upgrades.
Yet the XP deadline has been making waves, for a couple of reasons. "This date has passed at least four times in the past without any coverage," said Michael Cherry, an analyst with Directions on Microsoft. He's referring to past upgrades, from Windows 2000 to XP, for example.
"Why is this a story?" he said. "Because whether or not it's true, the perception is that Vista is a bad OS."
Vista had a rocky launch with many users complaining of performance glitches and particular problems when running the OS on computers other than the very fastest, high-end machines.
Still, reluctance to upgrade now, more than a year after Vista launched, varies widely between consumer and enterprise customers.
While XP's deadline affects consumers more so than business users -- enterprises also must buy PCs that come with Vista but they'll be able to downgrade to XP -- many home Windows users are largely just fine with buying Vista machines.
IDC is expecting so few consumers to buy XP machines this year, that it is projecting that as many as 98 percent of consumer PCs sold in 2008 will use Vista.
That's very different than the enterprise customer. While around 70 percent of business buyers will purchase Vista computers in 2008, probably half will downgrade to XP, said Al Gillen, an analyst with IDC. So only around 35 percent of new business PCs sold in 2008 will use Vista, he said.
Consumers, who may hope to buy a PC that will last for several years, are more interested in buying the latest technology, the analysts said.
"When you go out and buy a new machine, I'm not sure you want it with an 8-year-old operating system," Gillen noted. Most consumers will want to "move forward rather than look backward," he said.
"I think it's better for customers not to go back," Cherry agreed. Even though Microsoft will continue to support XP, consumers will be better off going with the newest OS, which also is the one Microsoft is actively maintaining, he said.
However, savvy consumers who really want to buy new machines with XP can still get it several ways. They can simply go to Dell's Web site and order one of the business PCs, which come with Vista but can be downgraded to XP, Gillen said.
In addition, Microsoft will continue to allow the low-cost laptops to ship with XP.
Microsoft is also allowing small specialty PC builders to sell computers with XP through January 2009. Consumers may also see shrink wrapped copies of the software and even PCs with XP in stores for a while as the shops empty inventory, Microsoft said.
But while consumers may happily buy Vista, stories of enterprise resistance continue to pop up. Notably, Microsoft partner Intel recently said that XP is and will be by far the dominant OS for the bulk of Intel's 80,000 employees. The company is testing and deploying Vista in certain departments, it said.
Enterprises are perhaps more aware of the technical issues that plagued Vista at launch and they want to be sure that any new OS will work well with existing software investments.
Microsoft continues to encourage enterprise customers to upgrade. In a letter sent a week before June 30 to business users of Windows, Bill Veghte, Microsoft senior vice president of online services and the Windows business group, laid out the ways that enterprises can continue to use XP and also described reasons that they should upgrade to Vista.
He acknowledged the early issues Vista had at launch and said they've been addressed. "The architectural changes that improved security and resilience in Windows Vista led to compatibility issues with existing hardware and applications," Veghte wrote. "Many hardware drivers and applications needed to be updated, and while the majority worked well when we launched Windows Vista, some key applications and drivers were not yet available." Vista now supports twice as many components and devices as it did at launch, he said.
According to a spokeswoman from Microsoft's public relations firm, there is no deadline for the XP downgrade offer for business customers. There is a deadline, however, for when Microsoft will supply XP discs to the manufacturers to include in the box with a new PC. After January 2009, if a business customer wants to downgrade to XP, it will have to work directly with Microsoft to do so.
IDG News Service
Symantec Backup Exec 12 and Backup Exec System Recovery 8 deliver industry leading Windows data protection and system recovery. Download this whitepaper to find out the top reasons to upgrade and how to get continuous data protection and complete system recovery.
Data and system loss — from a hard drive failure, malicious attack, natural disaster, or simple human error — can happen anytime. Don’t leave your business vulnerable. Make sure you have a secure recovery strategy in place. Symantec's latest backup and system recovery technology can efficiently restore critical applications, individual emails and documents and even restore your entire system in minutes in the event of a loss.
Businesses face a growing challenge to ensure that the IT environment is properly protected. Backup Exec 12 integrates with other applications in the Symantec family of products, to complement your current data protection strategy, keep your data securely backed up and make it recoverable when you need it most.
Crimeware: Understanding New Attacks and Defenses
By Markus Jakobsson, Zulfikar Ramzan
Published Apr 6, 2008 by Addison-Wesley Professional. Part of the Symantec Press series.
Enter now! | Official rules | Sample chapter
Securing VoIP Networks: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Countermeasures
By Peter Thermos, Ari Takanen
Published Aug 1, 2007 by Addison-Wesley Professional.
Enter now! | Official rules | Sample chapter








MicroSoft just does not get
MicroSoft just does not get it. Neither does Apple for that matter. I think the time is fast arising that an open source OS is the next step, just like the Firefox browser is now. I think many, many users are fed up with OS's that consume more resources, require faster processors, and more memory but only provide a slightly "prettier" GUI in return. It would be different if either of these companies were interested in building an efficient OS, but they are not. They are only interested in driving the market for more expensive hardware which in turn lets them reap huge profits from resource demanding software which in turn requires even bigger, even more expensive machines, ad nauseum. Once an open standard OS becomes more widely accepted, then application software manufacturers will follow suit. Innovation, diversity, and competition will be restored and the whole industry will benefit enormously.An open source standard will
An open source standard will never be accepted. There are too many factors to this. With the open source liscencing as it is there are no patent or code protections and no hardware manufactuer wants to divuldge its trade secrets from open code (as this is the power not the hardware itself- especially for cheap hardware) Proprietary drivers are by their nature not going to work on anything that their creators do not want them to.There is no financial incentive to support hardware on opensource based systems as the software is mostly free. For a company that requires revenue from software that is not going to work. With no financhal incentive they wont put the money in
There is no "one standard" kernal and flavour and each one needs to have a program compiled and "optimized" according to the flavour of OS. This isnt like a DirectX system on Microsoft that everyone is expected to follow. Without something like that expected among the 5000+ flavours of Free operating systems each one almost having their own installation systems no hardware manufacturer is even going to bother spending the R+D to get it to work on everything. Without a fully functioned device driver that works on everything it will not work appropriately in this type of system
Finally Open Source people dont want a standard. Its all about customization and individuality. Even if this means complete incompatibility with everyone else. It is a statement of rebellion as much as a technological one. With that attitude prevalant to sometimes almost irrationality no company who is in it to make money can ever "cater to everyone" to achieve its needed sucess.